“It’s not what you know that gets you into trouble, it’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.” — Mark Twain
Probability and randomness biases are cognitive biases that can affect our ability to make accurate judgments and decisions based on the likelihood of certain outcomes.
This list includes common biases, such as the anchoring bias and availability heuristic, as well as lesser-known biases, such as the clustering illusion and the Monte Carlo fallacy.
Understanding these biases can help us make more informed decisions and avoid common pitfalls in our thinking.
What are Probability and Randomness Biases?
Probability and randomness biases refer to a range of cognitive biases that affect how people perceive, evaluate, and respond to probabilities and uncertainty.
They can cause people to make errors in judgment and decision-making when trying to assess the likelihood of events and outcomes.
Probability and Randomness Biases
Here are some common probability and randomness biases:
- Anchoring bias: This bias occurs when people rely too heavily on the first piece of information they receive when making a decision or judgment.
- Availability heuristic: This is a mental shortcut that relies on immediate examples that come to mind when evaluating a specific topic or idea.
- Base rate fallacy: This is a common error in reasoning where people ignore the base rate or underlying probability when assessing the likelihood of an event.
- Conjunction fallacy: This is the tendency to believe that a specific combination of events is more probable than a single event, despite the former being logically less likely.
- Gambler’s fallacy: This is the belief that random events are influenced by previous events or outcomes, when in reality each event is independent and unrelated.
- Hindsight bias: This is the tendency to believe that an event was predictable and should have been foreseen after it has occurred.
- Illusion of control: This is the belief that individuals have more control over random events than they actually do.
- Illusory correlation: This is the perception of a relationship between two events or variables when none actually exists.
- Insensitivity to sample size: This is the tendency to draw conclusions based on small sample sizes, which can be unrepresentative of the larger population.
- Neglect of prior probabilities: This is the failure to take into account prior probabilities or base rates when assessing the likelihood of an event.
- Overconfidence effect: This is the tendency to overestimate one’s abilities or the accuracy of one’s judgments.
- Positive bias: This is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes and underestimate the likelihood of negative outcomes.
- Regression fallacy: This is the mistaken belief that an extreme event is likely to be followed by a less extreme event, when in fact the subsequent event is likely to be closer to the mean.
- Scope neglect: This is the tendency to underestimate the impact of a problem or issue due to its scale or scope.
- Selection bias: This is the bias that arises from the way that data is collected, such as non-random sampling or self-selection.
- Stereotyping: This is the tendency to make assumptions or judgments about individuals based on preconceived notions about their race, gender, religion, etc.
- The clustering illusion: This is the tendency to see patterns or clusters in random data.
- The hot hand fallacy: This is the belief that a person who has experienced success in the past is more likely to continue experiencing success in the future.
- The law of small numbers: This is the mistaken belief that small sample sizes are representative of the larger population.
- The Monte Carlo fallacy: This is the belief that if a random event has occurred frequently in the past, it is less likely to occur in the future.
10 Examples How Probability and Randomness Biases Can Help You Think and Do Better
Here are 10 examples of how knowing probability and randomness biases can help you think and do better:
- Availability Heuristic: After a series of plane crashes, people may believe that air travel is more dangerous than it actually is due to the availability of vivid news coverage. An example of availability heuristic is when people make judgments about the likelihood of an event based on how easily they can bring examples of similar events to mind. For instance, after seeing a few news reports about shark attacks, someone might start to believe that the chances of being attacked by a shark are much higher than they actually are, even though the actual probability of such an event is quite low.
- Conjunction fallacy: Assuming that a person is both an accountant and a marathon runner, even though the likelihood of both being true is lower than the likelihood of just one being true.
- Gambler’s Fallacy: Thinking that the odds of winning increase after a series of losses or vice versa, when in reality, the odds remain the same. An example would be a stock trader who assumes that a stock that has been performing poorly for several months will soon experience a rebound simply because it has been doing poorly for so long.
- Hindsight Bias: Looking back at an event and believing that it was more predictable than it actually was, leading to overconfidence in future predictions. An example of hindsight bias is when an investor says “I knew that stock was going to crash” after the stock market crashes, even if they did not actually predict the crash before it happened. This bias can cause people to overestimate their ability to predict past events and make them more susceptible to making the same mistakes in the future.
- Illusion of Control: Overestimating one’s ability to control random events, such as believing that they have a higher chance of winning a lottery by choosing specific numbers. An example of Illusion of Control is a gambler who thinks that they have control over the outcome of a game of chance, such as a slot machine, by using a particular pattern or technique to push the button or pull the lever. Despite the fact that the outcome is completely random, the gambler may feel that they have some control over the result, leading them to engage in more gambling behavior. This bias can lead to the development of gambling addiction and can cause individuals to lose large amounts of money.
- Insensitivity to Sample Size: Making generalizations based on a small sample size without taking into account the larger population. For instance, a company’s marketing team might launch a new product after receiving positive feedback from a few customers during a focus group, without conducting more extensive market research or surveys to ensure that the product will be successful among a larger population.
- Neglect of Prior Probabilities: Failing to consider the prior probability of an event occurring, leading to overconfidence or underestimation of the likelihood of that event. An example of neglect of prior probabilities is when a doctor assumes that a patient has a rare disease because they have several of the symptoms, without considering that the disease is actually very rare and there are many more common conditions that could also explain the symptoms. This can lead to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment, and highlights the importance of considering the prior probability of a given condition before making a diagnosis or treatment decision.
- Scope Neglect: Imagine you are considering donating money to a charity that helps provide clean drinking water to people in developing countries. You might be more likely to donate if you see a photo of one child who has received clean water and hear a personal story about their life, even though this is just one example and the scale of the problem is much larger.
- Selection Bias: When conducting a survey, you might inadvertently select a biased sample of participants, such as only surveying people who are easily accessible or have strong opinions on the topic, leading to results that do not accurately represent the population.
- The Monte Carlo Fallacy: Believing that a string of random events must eventually balance out, such as assuming that after several coin flips landing on heads, the next one is more likely to land on tails. For example, if a coin is flipped five times and lands on heads each time, the Monte Carlo Fallacy would suggest that the probability of it landing on tails on the next flip is higher, when in reality it is still 50/50.
Know Your Probability and Randomness Biases to Think and Do Better
“The more we learn about our biases, the more we can outsmart them.” — David McRaney
Probability and randomness biases refer to the ways in which our perception of probability can be biased, leading us to make errors in judgment and decision-making.
These biases include anchoring bias, availability heuristic, base rate fallacy, and more, and can have implications for everything from personal finance to medical decision-making.
Being aware of these biases and learning strategies to overcome them can help us become more effective critical thinkers and decision-makers.
You Might Also Like
Big List of Biases
Attitude and Belief Biases
Investment and Commitment Biases
Perception and Memory Biases
Scotoma: Why You Can’t See What’s Right in Front of You
How Labeling Others Distorts Your Thinking
How To Improve Your Critical Thinking
How To Practice Precision Questions and Answers